AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Aggressively dislike this…
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Kitchen TableMessage format
 
moon1234
Posted 10/13/2023 09:11 (#10438699 - in reply to #10433483)
Subject: RE: Aggressively dislike this…



De Forest, WI
Von WC Ohio - 10/9/2023 08:27

Everyone should be aware by now that the C19 thing was due to gain of function research likely funded by corrupt/bought people in the US and having the work done in China and other places around the world. 

The holy grail of biological weapons has always been to find and exploit a genetic defect/trait that wipes out your enemy and leaves your population unaffected. Of course if you get this wrong you kill your own population as well unless you have an effective antidote.

Don't think for a second that nefarious actors all around the world aren't doing research looking for ways to accomplish this.

Having access to huge amounts of DNA data allows them to look for certain markers that are widely prevalent and can be targeted with gain of function viruses and other nasty stuff.

The sheep continue to follow orders and sleep while these rogues continue to perpetrate crimes against humanity.



This is a little tin foil hatish, in my opinion. While I do believe COVID 19 was gain of function research, it wasn’t for the purpose that was put forth. This was just outright greed to get grant money.

The military provides grant money for private companies to try and identify and prevent threats in areas of the world where the US military may deploy. These grants can be used to created effective counter measures. In the case of COVID 19 it was to inoculate bats that are endemic in east Asia and are non-symptomatic carriers of lots of human pathogens, SARS being one of them.

Initially DARPA was approached for the grant money, but DARPA turned the private company down because DARPA considered it gain of function research and that is outlawed.

The private company then went to the CDC which ultimately DID provide funding. Who was running the CDC at that time? Fauchi. He had investments in companies that were involved with the company that received the grant money. That’s why he won’t answer any questions about this.

This is also why China initially accused the US military of developing it. Probably due to spies somewhere that couldn’t see the project was denied by DARPA.

The research was conducted in Wuhan because the lead researcher in China on bats, for more than 20 years, worked out of that lab.

The release of COVID 19 was probably an accident. Either due to sloppy containment or someone getting infected and leaving the facility. In order to make an effective vaccine for BATS they would need to develop a delivery system. You can’t inject bats. Some an aerosolized gas was the chosen method. Essentially drop an aerosol vaccine bomb in the caves when the bats are sleeping and they inhale in.

N95 masks were used for testing the aerosol as bats sleep with their wings over their heads. This acts as an effective mask/filter similar to N95. So the vaccine needed to pass through an n95 mask. DARPA knew this as it was part of the project design specification. It is also why the military knew n95 would not work as an effective filter.

While I understand the fear around eugenic type weapons, ancestry.com is far from that. If you want to worry then I would look at law enforcement. It is pretty easy to setup a dragnet and look for relatives of an unknown DNA sample. Once you have the names and family connections of a DNA sample the potential list of suspects is narrowed significantly. This also works for catching spies, foreign agents, etc. It is a lot easier to blackmail someone when you can find out who their relatives/family are using something like ancestry.com.

Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)