AgTalk Home
AgTalk Home
Search Forums | Classifieds (76) | Skins | Language
You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

I am probably just a slow learner, & fast to forget!
View previous thread :: View next thread
   Forums List -> Crop TalkMessage format
 
Hay Wilson in TX
Posted 9/6/2007 15:23 (#199403 - in reply to #199350)
Subject: Something else I picked up over the weekend.



Little River, TX
A good while back we had an interesting dialog on the usefulness of base saturation ratios.
Some fellow in Australia wrote that a calcium ratio of 20% can and will result in optimal production, and the 60% to 70 % Ca is not needed.

What did catch my eye was a soil test result of 15/1 for Ca/K in ppm. With my presumed 7,000 ppm Ca that computes to 467 ppm K soil test readings. This fits reasonably using CEC 44 meq/100g times the magic 10.44 factor.
They had some other cation ratios that do not fit my local findings in probability or possibility.

Also they also restate the caveat "P & K soil test results are not the total levels but represent a portion of the total and are a representation. The amount extracted must be calibrated with field research to determine amounts of fertility at each nutrient level." Something our Texas Cow College has not attempted.



Top of the page Bottom of the page


Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)