|
| This situation is making me question how significant all of this really is. The difference between the Logan report and the Regen report is so extremely different concerning base saturation, and I thought I had it fairly "balanced", so its making me highly question nutrient balancing, at least based on CEC. This area I tested grows really well and one test says I have 67% or so calcium while the other says I have 41%. Ultimately I probably will experiment with a very small section 50 sqft or so to see if I can flush out aluminum and bring the levels up, then see if there is really any significant difference between the two areas side by side. Like you said, in field experience is what really matters. Thanks. | |
|
Which lab is correct and what would you do?
