Viewing a thread - Reduced Rates of Fertilizer

You are logged in as a guest. ( logon | register )

Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts	View previous thread :: View next thread
Forums List -> Crop Talk	Message format

mhagny

Posted 7/31/2006 09:07 (#31427 - in reply to #31386)
Subject: RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer -- Mark, Pat

Mark,

No worries at all. We all have glitches in our on-board 'hard drive' sometimes! I felt a bit guilty myself for questioning you so hard on the results -- but I've just had too many instances where the producer claimed X increase in soil OM, and then when you start examining the details, you find the evidence is quite weak (too few soil cores or fields tested, different people took the samples, different depths of cores, different labs used, etc).

Your results of an increase of ~ 1.0% or more in 9 yrs is still quite impressive. And is probably related to your move toward higher residue crops on those fields, as well as NT.

Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - GTD : 7/28/2006 01:01
- RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - theory-fact-doubt - Ron..NE ILL..10/48 : 7/28/2006 06:37
  - Re: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - Bill Moyer : 7/28/2006 15:40
    - Re: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - GTD : 7/28/2006 17:35
    - Re: P is mobile, albeit slowly - mhagny : 7/28/2006 23:35
      - Re: P is mobile, albeit slowly - Bill Moyer : 7/29/2006 00:58
        
        And a look in the other direction. - Hay Wilson in TX : 7/30/2006 14:37
  - RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - theory-fact-doubt - GTD : 7/28/2006 17:31
    - RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - theory-fact-doubt - mhagny : 7/29/2006 10:44
  - I have my doubts that stripped fert is anymore avail. than broadcast. - Harpo : 7/28/2006 21:05
    - Well Yes and No, A lot depends--- - Hay Wilson in TX : 7/29/2006 13:43
- RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - M : 7/28/2006 08:34
  - RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - Mark : 7/28/2006 09:56
    - RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - mhagny : 7/28/2006 10:39
      - RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - robaer1 : 7/28/2006 11:03
      - RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - Mark : 7/28/2006 17:17
    - RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - pat-michigan : 7/28/2006 16:36
      - RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - Mark : 7/28/2006 20:24
        
        RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer -- Mark, Pat - mhagny : 7/28/2006 23:19
        
        RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer -- Mark, Pat - Mark : 7/29/2006 10:10
        
        RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer -- Mark, Pat - mhagny : 7/29/2006 11:04
        
        RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer -- Mark, Pat - Mark : 7/29/2006 19:37
        
        RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer -- Mark, Pat - mhagny : 7/30/2006 10:14
        
        RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer -- Mark, Pat - Mark : 7/30/2006 16:01
        
        RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer -- Mark, Pat - Mark : 7/31/2006 00:31
        
        RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer -- Mark, Pat - mhagny : 7/31/2006 09:07
        
        RE: review of research on soil OM changes - mhagny : 7/31/2006 09:18
        
        RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer -- Mark, Pat - pat-michigan : 7/29/2006 11:49
        
        RE: biological vs chemical view of soil fertility - mhagny : 7/30/2006 10:19
        
        RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - wolf : 7/29/2006 18:07
        
        RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - Mark : 7/29/2006 19:11
        
        RE: cover crop rye - mhagny : 7/30/2006 10:25
        
        Mark - Dave Cen.Ia : 7/30/2006 12:43
        RE: cover crop rye - Mark : 7/30/2006 16:21
  - RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - GTD : 7/28/2006 17:41
- RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - plowboy : 7/28/2006 13:42
  - The way the "70%" was explained to me was.......... - jakescia : 7/28/2006 14:30
    - RE: The way the "70%" was explained to me was.......... - John Burns : 7/28/2006 23:42
- RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - york : 7/29/2006 02:27
- RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - plot data - Ron..NE ILL..10/48 : 7/29/2006 08:09
  - Re: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - Greywolf : 7/29/2006 09:14
    - Re: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - Ron..NE ILL..10/48 : 7/29/2006 09:57
      - Re: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - Bill Moyer : 7/29/2006 10:21
  - RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - plot data - GTD : 7/29/2006 10:51
  - RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - plot data - Gary, Eastern Iowa : 7/29/2006 13:04
    - RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - plot data - John Burns : 7/29/2006 22:48
    - RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - plot data - mhagny : 7/30/2006 10:34
    - RE: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - Gary's links above - Ron..NE ILL..10/48 : 7/30/2006 11:08
      - Re: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - Greywolf : 7/30/2006 13:39
        
        Re: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - Ron..NE ILL..10/48 : 7/30/2006 15:00
        
        Re: Reduced Rates of Fertilizer - In reference to Ron's posts - Greywolf : 7/30/2006 16:20

Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread

(Delete cookies)